Transference first appears as an obstacle in the
course of free association, as a silence in the middle of the speech, full
of passion, but also full of the presence of the analyst. The usual ways of
its interpretation through repetition are wrong ones according to Lacan. The
right one is much more the link between love and knowledge, that is to say,
between the subject supposed to know and the part of jouissance responding
to the emptiness of the subject. Through that, and with the analyst,
transference indicates the stakes of what has to be the analyst to do with
the real included in the symptom.
Session 1: The encounter of love in the analytic
experience
The
encounter with love as an obstacle in the well-known Freudian way to
transference, his second discovery after the unconscious. But it is
worthwhile not to mislead here: there is no unconscious without
transference, and love is both a true one and a deceptive way, even if it
is impossible not to follow it.
Session 2: What is the subject supposed to know?
The
subject supposed to know is a lacanian concept, a key point of
transference. It seems both easy to understand and full of contradictions.
The main point is that it is centered by a hole, where the supposition
comes and with which the analyst ought to find its place, without
identifying to it, as the analysand does.
Session 3: The links between knowledge and
jouissance through the experience of transference
With
the subject supposed to know, transference allows to develop unconscious as
knowledge where something is always wanting. That is the reason why there
is there a way to what Lacan called his object (a), as a jouissance without
which nothing of these constructions would be consistent and linked to the
real. That is the stake of the analytical clinics.
Session 4: Destiny of transference at the end of
the treatment
The
end of the analytical experience is usually associated with a term as
« liquidation of transference ». Is there no more transference at
the end of treatment? It is more contradictory; it depends of the destiny
of the symptom. So what is the matter here?
Bibliography
Freud
The Dynamics of Transference (1912) Vol. XII, The Standard Edition,
London, Hogarth Press, 1974
Observations on Transference-love (1915), Vol. XII, The Standard Edition,
London, Hogarth Press, 1974
Analysis Terminable and Interminable (1937), Vol. XXIII, The Standard
Edition, London, Hogarth Press, 1974
Lacan
Seminar XI, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, New
York, Norton, 1977, chapters 10 to 19
La méprise du sujet supposé savoir (1967), Autres Ecrits, Paris,
Seuil, 2001
Proposition of 9 October 1967 on the Psychoanalyst of the School,
translated by Russell Grigg, Analysis VI, 1995
Jacques-Alain Miller
Paradigms of Jouissance, Lacanian Ink # 17, 2000
PROGRAM
Saturday October 27, 2007
8:30 Registration
9:00 1st Session: The encounter of love in the
analytic experience
10:15 Clinical Case Presentation: Rolf Flor, Boston
11:30 Coffee Break
11:45 2nd Session: What is the subject supposed to
know?
1:00 Lunch
3:00 3rd Session: The links between knowledge and
jouissance through the experience of transference
4:15 Clinical Case Presentation:
Fernando Schutt
, Miami
5:30 Coffee Break
5:45 4th Session: Destiny of transference at the
end of the treatment
7:00 Closing remarks
Registration Fee Schedule
Before October 5, 2007
Seminar, including Lecture: $ 90,00
Students: $ 40,00
At the door:
Seminar, including Lecture: $ 130,00
Students: $ 60,00
Lecture only: $ 20,00
Students: $ 10,00
Registration information:
Make check payable to: New York Freud Lacan Study Group
Address:
New York Freud Lacan Study Group
240 E 35th St.. Apt. 7 K
New York, NY 10016
PREPARATORY READINGS
Please note there will be two preparatory readings for this Seminar.
Barnard Hall, Room # 407, Broadway at
117 St
., New York City.
8 pm
October 17, 07: We will discuss the three Freudian texts.
October 24, 07: We will discuss Lacan’s texts:
Seminar XI, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, New
York, Norton, 1977, chapters 16 to 19
Proposition of 9 October 1967 on the Psychoanalyst of the School,
translated by Russell Grigg, Analysis VI, 1995
All are welcome. Please refer to the suggested
bibliography if you wish to extend your readings.
For more information: nyflag@yahoo.ca
|